COMPLEX
LITIGATION DOCUMENT PRODUCTION AND TRACKING:
IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN TO ME!!!
BY JIM BARBER, CP
A
light breeze kept the temperature quite pleasant as I strolled
to opposing counsel’s office this late Utah summer afternoon
to conduct a document review. Stopping at a crosswalk, I thought
about the planning and strategy meeting of last week, wherein
we discussed what specific items I needed to look for in the
anticipated three to five thousand page document production
of opposing counsel and how quickly I could have those detailed
items copied and returned to our office for use in a motion
currently being drafted. My thoughts were piercingly interrupted
by the audible crosswalk sound for the visually impaired at
which point I continued on to opposing counsel’s office.
Upon
entering the reception area I was asked to take a seat and
politely advised someone would be down in a minute to escort
me to a conference room where the document review was to take
place. Moments later a paralegal colleague appeared who escorted
me to the conference room. Upon entering the conference room
I noticed several banker’s’ boxes around three
walls of the room, with two banker’s boxes on the conference
table. Anticipating only one banker’s box, and at most
two, it struck me as rather odd for all of these other boxes
to be in the conference room.
“Before
I could verbalize a question, opposing counsel entered the
room; we exchanged greetings; he then uttered those unexpected
words: ‘Along these walls you have 75 banker’s
boxes of documents, with an additional 16 expandable file
folders on the window sills and 203 banker’s boxes shrink-wrapped
in our clients’ warehouse. Where would you like for
us to have those delivered for your review?’ All I remember
saying is, ‘Pardon me, would you please repeat what
you just said very slowly?’ It was at this very moment
my work life dramatically changed for several months to come.”
The
Documents
Over 200,000 documents were contained in the banker’s
boxes and expandable file folders that day, not counting the
estimated 600,000 documents contained in the 203 shrink-wrapped
banker’s boxes and 300,000 documents expected as a result
of subpoenas. Some of the 200,000 documents had been placed
on CD’s and DVD’s as single-page, non-searchable,
tagged-image file format, more commonly known as tif images.
A tif image is a picture, which format is used extensively
for traditional print graphics.
Complicating
matters further, although the documents contained Bates stamp
numbers, the documents did not contain a Bates stamp numbering
sequence specific to our case. In fact, opposing counsel adamantly
stated it would not provide a Bates stamp numbering sequence
for these documents specific for use in this case. As it turns
out, the majority of these documents were produced in other
litigation by opposing counsel and other parties, and contained
Bates stamp numbers unique to those cases leaving me with
approximately 30 different Bates stamp number sequences to
follow.
Considering
all of this it was imperative that I remember 18 subpoenas
were pending service to various individuals, businesses and
government agencies, where I had assigned an additional Bates
stamp number sequence specific to each subpoena. Now I was
facing almost 50 different Bates stamp number sequences to
track.
Having
gathered the background information concerning opposing counsel’s
documents, documents yet to be produced and the overall size
of this project, I needed to form a plan which would allow
me to effectively accomplish the enormous tasks associated
with handling a large document case.
The
Plan
After providing a detailed report and my plan for a solution,
to my supervising attorney and subsequently to the firm’s
administration, where I was charged with the responsibility
of carrying out my all inclusive economical plan which not
only accomplishes the firm’s document needs related
to this case, but also the firm’s needs in the future,
where the majority of all document production would be provided
to opposing counsel electronically via the internet.
It
was also incumbent on me to keep in mind the firm must not
only meet its specific document needs in Salt Lake City, but
also the needs of the client located in Pittsburgh, the insurance
company located in New York, national counsel whose offices
are located in Los Angeles & New York, other counsel in
Washington D.C. and a party of interest near Tallahassee,
Florida.
Realizing
the document production received thus far in this case, combined
with the estimated documents on the way, would be virtually
impossible to control manually, I knew I would need to steer
this project into the world of electronic imaging, a world
where the firm possessed short range plans to go within the
next couple of years, but had not actually started the steps
to get there.
Facing
this reality, I immediately sent e-mails to various paralegal
colleagues seeking advice; posting requests for advice on
paralegal bulletin boards; and participating in paralegal
e-group forums. Additionally, I contacted national and local
paralegal associations, including the paralegal divisions
of various state bar associations. I received an overwhelming
response containing excellent thoughts, suggestions and comments.
As a result of those responses I began a journey down the
path to what I refer to as “software world.”
Software
World
Software world is a place where every software vendor has
the answer to any and all of your needs, for a price which
typically exceeds your budget. Upon arriving I began researching
and testing software product after software product. After
having researched over ten different software products, I
decided the best and most cost effective solution for our
needs was the askSam SDK Engine for user network software
(www.asksam.com).
Major
factors involved in the decision to select the askSam software
were: 1) its searchable free form database format, 2) ability
to manually code documents, 3) speedy search results over
the internet of gigabytes & terabytes of information,
4) ability to search within results, 5) versatility, 6) ability
to add customization at any time, 7) price (once you pay for
it you own perpetual licensing rights, no additional fees
unless you request additional services), 8) unlimited users
included in base costs (do not have to pay annual per user
license fees or user port fees), 9) accessible anywhere in
the world you have an internet connection and 10) customer
satisfaction money back guarantee (some minimal exclusions).
Remembering
a previous litigation case where I received exceptional coding
assistance from Bret Laughlin (bretl@litgroup.net) with the
Litigation Document Group an outside coding vendor assisting
firms across the United States, who coded our documents (coding
which basically consisted of inputting bibliographic and keyword
information into the electronic form of the document). I thought
it would not only be a cost saving but a great value if, as
documents are initially imported into askSam, the askSam program
would automatically populate the bibliographic fields and
assign master keywords to a document. I began working on a
“logic flow” for custom programming by the askSam
development department to achieve that goal.
The first “logic flow” project went so well, I
began a second “logic flow” project for the sole
purpose of automatically assigning categories to certain documents.
To achieve this goal, I requested my supervising attorney
to provide me with a category name such as “fraud”
and fifteen “fraud” category keywords. Using this
information, when the documents are initially imported into
askSam, the askSam program with a match of any four or more
of the fifteen “fraud” category keywords within
the document, automatically assigns that document to the “fraud”
category. Of course, categories and category keywords may
be added, modified or deleted at any time. By implementation
of these custom programmed logic flows it drastically reduced
and in some cases eliminated coding costs altogether.
As with any project, certain nuisances become apparent and
this project was no different. While traveling this path I
learned in order for any software to be able to search single-page
tif images, those images must first be converted using an
OCR method into searchable images so certain software can
read them. Once this was accomplished, I learned you have
to be concerned about multipage tif images, versus single
page tif images, which creates the need for document unitization.
At this stage, one very important item I learned was to ensure
you have Bates stamp number matching; otherwise your electronic
documents will contain one number and the actual tif image
of the document another. Incredibly through the invaluable
assistance of Boo Bendinger (bbendinger@ikon.com) with IKON
Office Solutions, who offers document efficiency solutions
throughout the United States, the nuisances were overcome
with ease.
Conclusion
Should an enormous document project ever be assigned to you,
first and foremost, stay calm, keep your wits about you, and
don’t overlook your paralegal colleagues, an invaluable
information source. With the information I received from my
paralegal colleagues, I not only saved time and steps, but
was pointed in the right direction of how to approach the
challenge of complex litigation document production and tracking.
Disclaimer
This article captures my experiences concerning a large document
project assigned to me during the course of my employment.
My experiences may not necessarily reflect experiences of
others who may have been associated with the project. Notably,
each document production project is unique and should be considered
with those specifics in mind. I encourage every law firm,
attorney and paralegal to seek guidance from colleagues, coding
vendors, document solution vendors, software vendors and others
regarding the handling of any large document project. This
article is not intended nor should it be considered legal
advice.
Jim
Barber is an accomplished author with articles published in
various legal publications and journals. Jim is also a Certified
Paralegal (CP) with the law offices of Christensen & Jensen
(www.chrisjen.com) in Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jim has over 18 years experience in litigation, corporate,
insurance, labor and employment law and real estate law. Over
the years Jim has worked with numerous employees and employers
and also enjoys the extraordinary experience of having worked
within the legal department of an airline pilots’ union
giving him a unique knowledge of labor & employment law.
Jim Barber is a 1987 graduate of a Paralegal Certificate Program
and earned his CP in 2000. Jim is a member of various legal
associations including the Rocky Mountain Paralegal Association
(RMPA) (www.rockymtnparalegal.org), the Legal Assistants Association
of Utah (LAAU) (www.laau.info) and the Legal Assistants Division
of the State Bar of Texas (LAD) (www.lad.org). Jim may be
reached by email at jim.barber@chrisjen.com.
[2005]
All rights reserved including the right of reproduction in
whole or in part in any form. |